Anyhoo - this all leads into my topic this week. As librarians, one of our more important, but often behind-the-scenes, duties is selecting materials - often called collection development. We spend most of our free time at the reference desk reading magazines, journals, listserv and blog posts, websites, etc. - all dedicated to helping us decide what materials to purchase for the library. So imagine my surprise when, during my catch-up, I read this review by Nancy Cannon on Booklist Online (http://www.booklistonline.com/default.aspx?page=show_product&pid=3198973):
Threats to human life invariably arouse public interest. Written for the nonspecialist, Encyclopedia of Pestilence, Pandemics, and Plagues covers the medical, cultural, sociological, and historical aspects of infectious diseases from prehistoric times to the present. About 300 articles, authored and signed by subject specialists, present an authoritative, often-engaging overview of diseases of consequence to humankind worldwide.

Sounds great, no? Well, guess what? We don't have it at the Longview Library and chances are we won't be getting it. There are several factors that go into selection decisions:
1) The most important factor is quality. We generally don't waste our time and money on material that hasn't received good reviews.
2) Of course, in this economic climate, another important factor is cost. Retail price on the EoPP&P is $199.95, which actually isn't too bad for a 920-page, hard-cover reference book with illustrations.
3) A third consideration is appropriateness, or how well material fits into our collection. This includes intended audience (4th-graders, college students, or nuclear physicists, for three examples) and specific classes or departments the material will support. This is one of the reasons why I don't think we'll be ordering the EoPP&P. After this semester's campus-wide reading of The Plague (which the Encyclopedia would have been perfect for...), there just aren't too many classes I can imagine needing to use an in-depth reference book on infectious diseases. In fact, as of this posting, the main library at WashU in St. Louis and the veterinary library (!) at MU were the only academic libraries in Missouri that had purchased it.
4) But the main reason I think we won't be buying the EoPP&P is duplication of materials. In general, we try not to buy stuff that covers the same ground as sources we already own. There are exceptions, of course. The most important one is updating older resources. Another would be anticipation of high demand (this would be material like dictionaries or extra copies of The Plague). If you didn't click on the link above, here's the next part of Nancy Cannon's review:

As I'm sure you can guess, we have this source. In fact, I cited it in this post. As noted there, we don't have the paper copy, but rather have access through one of our online subscription databases - Ancient and Medieval History Online, in this case - so you don't even have to come to the library to use it. Of course, we always appreciate people coming to the library too - it gives us a good excuse to stop reviewing materials for a while!
.
(PS - If you have any trouble accessing the library's Online Databases, give us a call at 672-2268 or go to our website and click the Reference Librarian Chat button - helping you use our resources is even more important than collection development!)
What a great tip--I'll try to mention it to my students Tuesday evening AFTER the "The Plague of Experts"!
ReplyDelete